Skip to content
PhD Journal Logo Tu vuo far el phdino

2023-10-03 CZI first steps

Novità

Section titled “Novità”

Phd

  • Bugfix:

    • Visualizzazione linea del tempo
    • Possibilità di aggiungere predicati che hanno già raggiunto il numero massimo di valori

  • Punto interrogativo cursore hover: non puoi cancellare / aggiungere

  • Ho modificato shacle in maniera tale che fabio:Expression sia obbligatorio (minCount 1 e maxCount 1) mentre tutti gli altri valori di type sono opzionali (minCount 0 e maxCount 1)

    sh:property
      [
        sh:path rdf:type ;
        sh:hasValue fabio:Expression ;
        sh:minCount 1 ;
        sh:maxCount 1 ;
      ] ;
      # General property shape for rdf:type
      sh:property
      [
        sh:path rdf:type ;
        sh:in (fabio:ArchivalDocument
          fabio:Book
          fabio:BookChapter
          doco:Part
          fabio:ExpressionCollection
          fabio:BookSeries
          fabio:BookSet
          fabio:DataFile
          fabio:Thesis
          fabio:JournalArticle
          fabio:JournalIssue
          fabio:JournalVolume
          fabio:Journal
          fabio:ProceedingsPaper
          fabio:AcademicProceedings
          fabio:ReferenceBook
          fabio:ReferenceEntry
          fabio:ReportDocument
          fabio:Series
          fabio:SpecificationDocument) ;
        sh:minCount 0 ;
        sh:maxCount 1 ;
      ] ;

  • Se presente lista di valori, vengono mostrati in un select option sia per la modifica che per l’aggiunta. Doppia validazione lato server

  • Proprietà non cliccabili

  • Configurazione

    • Data di creazione del dataset usata per snapshot di creazione in loro assenza

  • Fonte primaria versione in caso di reverse snapshot. Modificare anche descrizione

  • URL entity-history furbo (timestamp e versione). Gestiti out of index e date nel passato

  • Valori raggruppato per proprietà

CZI

  • Ho dato il mio contributo selezionando idee rilevanti e aggiungendo OpenCitations e SOftware Heritage all’elenco delle risorse
    • For a long time now a lot of different methods and tools co-exist to detect, disambiguate and characterize software mentions in scientific publications. But there is no gold dataset, no complete and exhaustive dataset of annotated publications widely approved by the scientific community. Such a dataset would be useful to be able to easily compare the results of different tools.
    • There’s a gap between academic papers and data/code repositories due to the absence of bidirectional links. We propose to develop a tool that connects scientific papers to their relevant GitHub repositories and vice versa. Our approach involves devising algorithms to search both academic platforms and GitHub for mutual references, integrating features into the tool for automatic link creation, and incorporating capabilities to auto-comment on platforms like arXiv when a corresponding GitHub repository is detected. Ultimately, we aim to promote the significance of traceability, emphasizing its importance to both the academic and developer communities.
    • The OpenAIRE Graph is a massive scholarly graph that collects metadata and links between research products (articles, datasets, software, and other research products), entities like organizations, funders, funding streams, projects, communities, and data sources. Specifically, OpenAIRE collects publication-to-software relations by (a) extracting them from the full text of Open Access publications, and (b) harvesting them from institutional repositories. In the context of this project, we propose to analyze the overlap of those publication-to-software relations collected by OpenAIRE with those reported by the CZI software mentions dataset. Furthermore, based on the results of the previous analysis, it could be beneficial to integrate the CZI software mentions dataset with the OpenAIRE Graph, enriching it with new publication-to-software relations.

Passaggio d’anno

  • Compilazione modulo attività svolte e scrittura relazione

Domande

Section titled “Domande”